Security & trust

Trust you can verify — not trust you have to assume.

PlancyAI is designed to be evidence-backed, permission-aware, and governed by the user. Nothing publishes without your intent, and key claims always point to source evidence.

Evidence

Control

Least privilege

Low noise

Posture

Our security stance

We start with least privilege (permission mirroring) and governed write-back (line items + approvals).

We prioritize evidence-backed truthfulness and auditability to prevent silent failures.

As we scale to larger customers, we'll add enterprise controls (SSO and compliance programs) as milestones rather than marketing claims.

Architecture

Data flow

PlancyAI's goal is simple: read what you can read, propose what's safe, publish only what you approve.

You connect Jira/Confluence with your own account (permission mirroring).

PlancyAI reads the Jira/Confluence data you can access (issues, statuses, comments, due dates, and linked pages).

PlancyAI generates a pulse + proposed updates, each tied to evidence links.

You review and approve line items.

PlancyAI writes back only the approved items under your authority (never bypassing permissions).

Permission mirroring (least privilege)

Connect using your own tracker account.
PlancyAI inherits your permissions — it can only see and do what you can.

Evidence and uncertainty

Evidence links for every key claim.
If facts are missing, PlancyAI shows uncertainty and asks a targeted question.

Truthfulness promise

Every published line is either:

Linked to at least one source in the tracker/docs
Explicitly marked as a user-provided statement (not an inferred fact)

Control model (governed write-back)

One fact per line, swipe-to-remove

Approval tiers (auto / confirm / review)

Audit and undo

PlancyAI never bypasses tracker permissions. All writes happen under the user's authority and can be reviewed line by line.

Have security questions?

We're happy to share details about our security posture for your pilot evaluation.